10 Resources to Help Your Employees Prepare for Retirement
Very helpful tips for retirement from the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), by Irene Saccoccio.
Social Security wants to help you prepare your employees for a secure, comfortable retirement. Security is the Social Security Administration’s middle name and we want everyone to enjoy the fruits of a lifetime of labor.
We mentioned before that being prepared when you retire can open new avenues of possibilities. Our website has tools and information to help you secure today and tomorrow. When it comes to retirement, we’ve got you covered with 10 tools to help you plan for your retirement, apply for, and then manage your benefits as you go along.
1. Our Retirement Estimator provides estimates based on your actual Social Security earnings record. Plug in different numbers, retirement dates, and scenarios to help you decide the best time for you to retire.
2. Using our Retirement Planner: Plan for Your Retirement can help you find your ideal retirement age, estimate your life expectancy and the amount of your benefits when you retire. You can test future retirement ages and various earning amounts.
3. Read Retirement Planner: Getting Benefits While Working to learn the rules and regulations about work after retirement, how it affects you, and what you should consider.
4. Retirement Benefits provides you with a broad overview of our retirement program. It covers how you earn coverage, how to apply, how benefits are figured, and how to decide when to retire.
5. When to Start Receiving Retirement Benefits takes a look at some factors that can help you make an informed decision about the best time to retire.
6. Your Retirement Benefit: How It Is Figured explains the formula Social Security uses to calculate your benefit amount, describes what factors can affect it, and offers a worksheet to help you estimate your retirement benefits.
7. The Medicare section of our website provides information about the Medicare program and answers general questions on Medicare.
8. Medicare Premiums: Rules for Higher-Income Beneficiaries explains the rules about people with higher incomes. If you have higher income, find out why you will pay an additional premium amount for Medicare Part B and Medicare prescription drug coverage.
9. Your personal my Social Security account is one of the most powerful tools available to secure your retirement. And lucky for you it’s at your fingertips. With a personal my Social Security account, your employees can get their Social Security Statement that shows estimates of their future retirement, disability, and survivors benefits. They can check their earnings to verify the yearly amounts that we posted are correct. They can also get estimates of Social Security and Medicare taxes they’ve paid.
10. Our online retirement application is an easy, convenient, and secure way to trail-blaze your way to retirement. You can complete it in as little as 15 minutes and, just like that, you can start the retirement of your dreams.
With these 10 resources, your employees can stay informed about their retirement options. Information is the first step toward achievement. When you retire one journey ends while another begins. Be ready for your next adventure!
Irene Saccoccio is the National Public Affairs Specialist for the U.S. Social Security Administration.
See the original article Here.
Source:
Saccoccio, I. (2016 September 15). 10 Resources to help your employees prepare for retirement. [Web blog post]. Retrieved from address https://blog.shrm.org/blog/10-resources-to-help-your-employees-prepare-for-retirement
Adopting a coaching mindset to help employees plan for retirement
Are your employees prepared for retirement? See how Cath McCabe gives tips and tricks on coaching your employee for retirement.
America may be becoming the land of the free and the home of the grey as more adults are living longer lives.
According to the Administration on Aging, the number of centenarians more than doubled between 1980 and 2013. But lifespans aren’t the only thing increasing – so are the expenses that many older Americans face.
Retiree health care costs have surged exponentially – the Employee Benefits Research Institute (EBRI) estimates that the average healthy 65-year-old man will need $124,000 to handle future medical expenses. For a healthy woman of the same age, the expected amount is $140,000.
Many of these extra years – or decades – will be spent in retirement, so it’s crucial that Americans plan to have the income they need not only to retire, but to last throughout a potentially long retirement.
Since many adults use employer-sponsored retirement plans as a source of retirement funding, plan sponsors are in a key position to act as retirement “coaches” by encouraging employees to plan ahead and help them plan for their financial security in retirement.
Engage employees early and often
We have found that employers are a trusted source of financial information for employees. Plan sponsors can leverage this trust to engage employees with a variety of programs and tools that help them understand their future retirement income needs.
A plan sponsor’s role as coach begins when employees begin their careers by providing financial education. Education can help new employees recognize the importance of contributing to a retirement plan and the benefits of saving early, as well as help to optimize employee participation in retirement programs. Education designed for mid-career employees, and those nearing retirement, can cover more complex topics as they encounter life events that require a change to their road map for retirement.
And if employees can get started earlier in their careers, there is an increased likelihood that employees will have a positive retirement experience. A recent survey among current TIAA retirees found that those who began retirement planning before age 30 are more likely to retire before the age of 60, and 75 percent say they are very satisfied with their retirement.
Coach employees through education and advice to create a retirement road map
Many Americans need help in setting and achieving their retirement goals – a recent survey found that 29 percent of Americans are saving nothing at all for retirement. It’s important to develop a retirement coaching strategy that can help put participants in the right frame of mind and offers the resources they need to establish clear retirement goals and a road map for achieving those goals.
Many people think about their retirement savings in terms of accumulation – how much of a “nest egg” they’re able to build to fund their retirement. But employers should help their employees think about their retirement savings in terms of the amount of income they will have each month to cover their living expenses. Having a source of guaranteed lifetime income can help employees mitigate the risk of outliving their retirement savings.
As a rule of thumb, most employees will need between 70 percent and 100 percent of their pre-retirement income. If employees find they are not on track to meet this ratio, plan sponsors can help identify the necessary actions to increase the chance of success. For example, employees may need to increase their savings rate. Plan sponsors can help by encouraging employees to save enough of their own dollars to get the full employer match. If employees already are saving enough to get the full match, they then should aim to increase their contributions each year until they are saving the maximum amount allowed. Many employees older than 50 also can take advantage of catch-up provisions to save additional funds.
Perhaps the most important function of education is to drive employees to receive personalized advice from a licensed financial consultant supporting the employer’s retirement plan. This is where the road map is created, with the advisor providing turn-by-turn guidance. For most employees, an annual meeting can help keep them on track.
Why is it important to “coach” employees to create the road map? Simply put, it can improve both plan outcomes and the employees’ retirement outcomes. Advice is proven to positively correlate with positive action – enrolling, saving or increasing saving or optimizing allocations. (See this Retirement Readiness research for more information). Individuals who have discussed retirement with an advisor are much more likely to “run the numbers” and calculate how much income they’ll need in retirement – 79 percent versus only 32 percent who have not met with an advisor.
Helping employees along the road to retirement is a win-win for employees and plan sponsors, even beyond the fiduciary requirements. A 2015 EBRI report found that 54 percent of employees who are extremely satisfied with their benefits, such as their retirement plan and health insurance, also are extremely satisfied with their current job. Similarly, a 2013-2014 Towers Watson study revealed that nearly half (45 percent) of American workers agree that their retirement plan is an important reason why they choose to stay with their current employer. Establishing strong connections between employees and their retirement plans may aid employers’ retention efforts.
Supporting employees on their retirement readiness journey
Once employees have a better sense of the actions they need to take, plan sponsors can provide additional support by highlighting the investment choices that may help employees achieve their desired level of income. Many employees may understand how to save, but they are far less familiar with how and when to withdraw and use their savings after they have stopped working. Offering access to lifetime income options, such as low-cost annuities, through the plan’s investment menu can help employees create a monthly retirement “paycheck” that they can’t outlive.
The peace of mind that these solutions offer can last a lifetime, too. A survey among TIAA retirees found that those who have incorporated lifetime income solutions into their retirement have been satisfied with that decision. Among the retirees with a fixed or variable annuity, 92 percent are satisfied with their decision to annuitize.
Employers also should set a benchmark for regularly evaluating employees’ progress toward their retirement goals. This will allow employees to monitor their retirement outlook and identify opportunities to adjust their savings strategy so they don’t veer off their retirement road map.
Remember the emotional aspect of retirement
In addition to the financial aspects of retirement planning, it’s important to factor in emotional considerations. Offering a mentoring program, one-on-one advice and guidance sessions, or workshops and seminars to guide people on how to navigate this major milestone could be helpful for new retirees.
For some employees, going from working full time to not working at all may be a too abrupt change. Employers may want to consider offering a phased approach to retirement that gives employees the opportunity to work part time or consult to help ease the transition. An alumni program that offers occasional reunions or other programming can help retirees still feel connected to their organization for many years after they stop working.
Employers are uniquely positioned to guide employees through the retirement planning process, from early in their careers to their last day in the office – and beyond. It’s not enough to simply get employees to retirement: Plan sponsors need to help them get through retirement as well. Establishing a coaching mindset can be an effective way to actively engage employees in retirement planning and help them see that the end of their working careers can be the beginning of a wonderful new stage of life.
See the Original Post from BenefitsPro.com Here.
Source:
McCabe, C. (2016, August 04). Adopting a coaching mindset to help employees plan for retirement [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.benefitspro.com/2016/08/04/adopting-a-coaching-mindset-to-help-employees-plan?slreturn=1472491323&page_all=1
Retirement income calculators: What to know about their projections
Nick Thornton outlines how retirement income calculator are not all the same. Do you have the guidance of a trusted expert?
Original Post from BenefitsPro.com on June 24, 2016
Not all retirement income projection tools are the same.
In fact, the modeling tools, which are becoming default features on recordkeeping and retail advisory platforms, generate wildly varying interpretations of how retirement savings will translate into income when the golden years arrive.
A new study from Corporate Insight, a provider of research and analytics to the financial services industry, surveyed 12 income-modeling tools — six from recordkeepers’ platforms, and six from retail advisory providers.
What the company found could call into question the value of some modeling tools in their existing form.
For retirement needs analysis, the Consumer Price Index isn't enough.
Analysts at Corporate Insight created a hypothetical saver profile: A single, 40-year old male New York resident who makes $100,000 a year and defers 10 percent of his income to a defined contribution plan, which has a balance of $100,000. His employer match is 3 percent. His 401(k) is allocated to suit his moderate level of risk tolerance, and he anticipates drawing a $1,500 a month Social Security benefit upon retiring at age 67.
Those factors, and others, were in put into the calculators, with a goal to replace 85 percent of income in retirement.
What came out was a variance in projections that amounted to nearly $30,000 in annual income, in the case of the greatest discrepancy.
$6,013 a month vs. $3,772 a month
MassMutual’s Retirement Planner tool, which is part of its recordkeeping platform, projected Corporate Insight’s hypothetical saver’s monthly income at $6,013. TIAA’s Retirement Advisor tool, a part of its recordkeeping platform, estimated the same input data to generate $3,772 a month.
The average monthly projection for the 12 modeling tools was $4,792.
No two calculators generated the same projected income.
But the Principal’s Retirement Wellness Planner, Prudential’s Retirement Income Calculator, and WealthMSI’s Retirement Planner 1, the tool of the plan rollover specialist that was acquired by DST in 2015, projected incomes within $88 of one another.
Gap analysis component
Nine of the 12 analyzed tools feature a “gap analysis” component, which compares current retirement income projections to a predetermined income replacement goal.
That analysis — measuring how an investor’s savings tendencies measure against the set goal — provides valuable context to income projection modeling, say Corporate Insight’s analysts, “and should be incorporated into the results of all retirement planning tools,” according to the report. MassMutual, the CalcXML 401(k) income calculator, and Capital One’s Retire My Way tool do not offer the gap analysis.
The nine tools that do offer gap analysis base their conclusions on vastly different income replacement rate goals.
For instance, Principal’s tool sets a monthly income replacement goal of about $9,000 for Corporate Insight’s hypothetical saver, the highest among the tools. TIAA set the lowest monthly income replacement rate goal, at about $4,900. The average income goal is set at about $6,600.
6 reasons for variation in the projection models
Corporate Insight identified six factors that led to the wide variation in modeling projections: taxes, inflation rates, salary growth, Social Security benefits, investment returns, and age —including expected retirement age and life expectancy assumptions.
Among those variables, assumptions on investment returns were the greatest reason for the wide discrepancy in projections, according to Corporate Insight.
Some of the calculators only permit one investment return assumption, meaning income projections don’t account for lower returns on less risky portfolio allocations after retirement.
Capital One assumes a pre- and post-retirement return of 7.35 percent for investors that select a “moderate” asset allocation strategy. Its tool projects the third highest monthly income at roughly $5,500, despite the fact it does not account for Social Security income or increased salary deferrals as income grows throughout a saver’s career.
Principal’s tool assumes a life expectancy of 92 years, and a 7 percent pre and post-retirement investment return.
The Merrill Lynch and WealthMSI tools apply more modest post-retirement return expectations, at 4.7 percent and 4 percent, respectively.
Part of the explanation behind MassMutual’s highest income projection is that the tool provides a non-adjustable Social Security benefit estimator, which offered a high benefit relative to Corporate Insight’s hypothetical saver’s earnings history, the analysts said.
Betterment and TIAA’s projection tools offer the lowest incomes at $3,791 and $3,772, respectively, largely because they are the only among the surveyed calculators to account for taxes and estimate projections in post-tax amounts, Corporate Insight’s report said.
Takeaways for sponsors and participants
While becoming a common feature, income replacement projection tools are still a relatively novel concept, and are likely to evolve as utilization increases.
Drew Way, senior retirement analyst at Corporate Insight and lead author of the study, said the data suggests sponsors and participants need to regard the tools as more of a guide than an exact predictor of retirement income.
“The biggest takeaway from this study is that individuals using retirement planning calculators need to be mindful that the underlying assumptions the tools employ can have a profound impact on both the results and the goal recommendations,” Way told BenefitsPro in an email.
"It's important, then, to at least know the assumptions a tool is using and to understand that it’s not meant to provide a 100 percent accurate analysis of an individual's level of retirement readiness,” he added. "Instead, the tools are meant to give users an approximation of where they stand with regard to achieving their retirement goals, and to equip them with the knowledge to then make appropriate actions to help them achieve those goals.”
Ready the full article at: https://www.benefitspro.com/2016/06/24/retirement-income-calculators-what-to-know-about-t?ref=mostpopular&page_all=1
Source:
Thornton, N. (2016, June 24). Retirement income calculators: What to know about their projections [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.benefitspro.com/2016/06/24/retirement-income-calculators-what-to-know-about-t?ref=mostpopular&page_all=1
IRS: Skip Form 5500’s Optional Compliance Questions
Original post shrm.org
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recently added new questions to the 2015 Form 5500 and 5500-SF (short form) annual retirement plan returns. The Form 5500 series of returns are used by retirement plans to report the financial condition, investments and operations of the plans to the Department of Labor (DOL) and IRS.
When the new IRS compliance questions were originally introduced, the IRS described the questions as optional for plan year 2015. However, in its most recent instructions, the IRS has specifically advised plan sponsors not to complete these questions for the 2015 plan year.
The IRS decision to delay completion is due to privacy and misreporting concerns raised by retirement plan administrators and advisors.
The new compliance questions are intended to aid the IRS in determining whether a retirement plan, such as a 401(k) plan, is in compliance with applicable law—in particular, how the plan is satisfying discrimination testing and making timely plan amendments. The new questions also ask whether the plan trust incurred unrelated business taxable income and if the plan made in-service distributions, such as hardships. Specifically, the following new lines were added:
Form 5500 Annual Return (Report of Employee Benefit Plan)
• Provide preparer information including name, address and telephone number.
Schedules H (Financial Informaiton) and Schedule I (Small Plan Financial Information)
• Did the plan trust incur unrelated business taxable income?
• Were in-service distributions made during the plan year?
• Provide trust information including trust name, EIN, and name and telephone number of trustee or custodian.
Schedule R (Retirement Plan Information) – New Part VII: IRS Compliance Questions
• Is the plan a 401(k) plan?
• How does the 401(k) plan satisfy the nondiscrimination requirements for employee deferrals and employer matching contributions?
• If the Average Deferral Percentage (ADP) test or Average Contribution Percentage (ACP) test is used, did the plan perform testing using the “current year testing method” for non-highly compensated employees?
• Did the plan use the ratio percentage test or the average benefit test to satisfy the coverage requirements under Section 410(b)?
• Does the plan satisfy the coverage and nondiscrimination tests by combining this plan with any other plans under the permissive aggregation rules?
• Has the plan been timely amended for all required tax law changes?
• Provide the date of the last plan amendment/restatement for the required tax law changes.
• If the plan sponsor is an adopter of a pre-approved master and prototype or volume submitter plan that is subject to a favorable IRS opinion or advisory letter, provide the date and serial number of that letter.
• If the plan is an individually-designed plan and received a favorable determination letter from the IRS, provide the date of the plan’s last favorable determination letter.
• Is the plan maintained in a U.S. territory?
Form 5500-SF Annual Return (Report of Small Employee Benefit Plan)
• Asks for all the information added to the Forms and Schedules above.
• Were required minimum distributions made to 5 percent owners who have attained age 70½?
When plan sponsors and plan administrators are eventually required to respond to these new questions, their responses could highlight plan compliance issues of which the plan sponsor or the IRS may not have been aware, and could lead to follow-up investigations from the IRS. The new questions are helpful guidance for plan sponsors to make certain that their 401(k) and 403(b) plans are in compliance.
Wellness Study Touts CFPs
Original post benefitspro.com
Only 22 percent of employees tracked in Financial Finesse’s 2015 year in review report being on track for retirement.
The provider of workplace financial wellness programs says that is a slight improvement from 2014. Of those that are not prepared, 81 percent have never used a financial calculator to estimate their retirement preparedness.
While the number of retirement-ready workers remains bleak, those participants who have repeated engagements with planning tools, and financial planners, are showing marked improvement in retirement readiness.
Enhancements in retirement workplace plan design, like auto-enrollment and auto-escalation, and technology that addresses asset allocation are vital tools for addressing workers’ retirement preparedness.
But the Financial Finesse’s data suggests those tools alone are not enough.
A good portion of the review is committed to comparing retirement readiness of those savers who engage in live interactions with financial planners.
About half of participants that had five or more interactions with a certified financial planner report being on track for retirement.
Levels of confidence drop in lock step with the number of interactions with financial planners: 32 percent of those with three to four interactions say they are on track to retire with adequate savings; 31 percent with one to two interactions believe as much; and only 21 participants who only interact with online planning tools say they are on track to retire with enough savings.
Interacting with CFPs also translates to higher confidence with investments and how they are allocated, as 64 percent of participants with five or more interactions say they are invested appropriately, compared to only 42 percent who use an online planning tool but don’t seek live financial advice.
Overall, retirement readiness is lacking across generations. Last year, only 30 percent of baby boomers say they are on track to reach their retirement goal, which was unchanged from the previous year.
Only 22 percent of Gen Xers and 16 percent of millennials said they are on track to retire well.
Debt is a major obstacle for boomers’ retirement readiness, the report says, as 42 percent of financially distressed boomers have no plan in place to pay off their debt, and increase from the previous year.
Participation rates in workplace retirement plans was high across all age groups, as even 73 percent of workers under age 30 report being enrolled in a plan; 91 percent of pre-retirees participate in their workplace plan.
Despite high rates of enrollment, financial planners and participants sited insufficient retirement savings as the top financial vulnerability for all age groups.
5 things to know about the DOL fiduciary rule
Original post benefitspro.com
Tomorrow marks the last day the White House’s Office of Management and Budget will accept meetings with industry stakeholders hoping to influence the finalization of the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule.
1. When will the DOL fiduciary rule be finalized?
That means a final rule could emerge as early as next week, but more likely by the end of the month, according to Brad Campbell, an ERISA attorney with Drinker Biddle.
Campbell and Fred Reish, who chairs Drinker Biddle’s ERISA team, addressed a conference call on the DOL rule’s potential impact.
Nearly 1,000 stakeholders participated, testament to the wide-ranging impact the rule is expected to have on advisors and service providers to workplace retirement plans and individual retirement accounts.
2. Will the DOL rule be stopped?
Several legislative efforts that would delay or defund the rule’s implementation, as well as strategies to address the rule through the appropriations process or the Congressional Review Act, are “real and substantive,” said Campbell, but stand little chance of blocking implementation of the rule.
“The likelihood that Congress can stop DOL is low,” said Campbell.
He expects more Democrats to find the rule to be problematic once it is finalized, but not enough to create the two-thirds majority needed to override a veto from President Obama, which would be all but guaranteed of any legislation Congress passes.
3. When would compliance be expected?
Campbell also said he expects the Obama Administration to waste little time making industry comply with the new rule. An end-of-year compliance date should be expected, he said.
“Obama is going to want to have a deadline in place before he leaves. That will make it much harder for the next administration to undue” the rule, said Bradford.
4. Will others try to block the rule?
While Congressional efforts to block the rule will likely prove impotent, Campbell said private lawsuits seeking to block the rule’s implementation are “a very real possibility.”
“DOL has done some things I think they lack the authority to do,” explained Campbell, who referenced a recent majority report from the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
That report alleged the Obama Administration was “predetermined to regulate the industry” and sought economic evidence to “justify its preferred action” in directing the DOL to write a rule that would expand the definition of fiduciary to include nearly all advisors to 401(k) plans and IRAs.
The report also claims DOL willfully ignored recommendations from the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Treasury Department and the OMB as it crafted its proposed rule.
Campbell called those arguments and others enumerated in the Committee’s report “legitimate.”
If lawsuits from stakeholders do emerge, courts may delay implementation of the rule as claims are litigated, but Campbell seemed to dissuade stakeholders from holding out too much hope for that possibility.
“No one can predict where the courts will go,” he said.
5. What will the fiduciary rule’s impact be?
Fully preparing for the rule’s impact is of course impossible before it is finalized.
Nonetheless, Campbell and Reish itemized the ways a final rule is likely to impact industry. They are hoping regulators address several vague areas of the proposal in the final weeks of the rulemaking process.
Still unknown is whether the rule will provide a grandfather provision for tens of millions of IRA accounts already in existence.
Also at question is the proposal’s education carve-out, which could greatly impact how service providers’ call centers interact with plan participants, and whether including specific funds in asset allocation models would rise to the level of fiduciary advice.
Campbell said he expects the DOL to finalize an education carve-out that is a bit more forgiving than what was initially proposed. He expects a final rule will allow specific investments to be mentioned, so long as a range of comparable options are offered as well.
There also is the question of whether or not 401(k) and IRA platform providers will be allowed to offer access to 3(21) and 3(38) fiduciaries, and whether or not doing so would be a fiduciary action.
But the biggest questions impacting a final rule’s ultimate impact relates to the proposal’s Best Interest Contract Exemption, said both Campbell and Reish.
How those exemptions are ultimately finalized will shape the IRA market and how providers and advisors recommend rollovers from 401(k) plans.
The attorneys said they expect a final rule to consider rollover recommendations a fiduciary act.
One concern for advisors will be when they need an exemption to advise on a rollover.
If general education on rollovers is offered, without advice, one natural consequence is that investors will ask advisors what they should do, said the attorneys.
“Is no advice better than so-called conflicted advice?” asked Reish rhetorically. “Prudent advice can still be prohibited” under the rule’s proposal, he said.
That fundamental question is likely to make whatever rule that emerges “extraordinarily disruptive” to the IRA market, the attorneys said.
Cybersecurity Should Be on Plan Sponsors’ Radar
Original post benefitspro.com
Cyber threats and attacks are so widespread that retirement plan sponsors are being warned to develop a cyber risk management strategy rather than a cyber risk elimination strategy.
That’s according to law firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, which said in an advisory that among other concerns, sponsors should be prepared to evaluate their third-party service providers’ cybersecurity programs and ensuring that the plans themselves have mitigated risks from losses in case of a cyberattack.
It shouldn’t come as a big surprise to anyone, considering that there’s a $5 trillion 401(k) market just sitting there waiting to be ravaged by hackers.
Considering that account holders often don’t check their accounts often enough to catch hacking attempts, and that the advisors and plan providers hold another wealth of information (pun intended) on those account holders, the retirement plan market is ripe for the plucking.
In its first of a series of advisories on cybersecurity issues regarding retirement plans, the law firm said that an effective cyber risk management strategy would include thorough due diligence by sponsors of TPAs and vendors; periodic implementation and review of contractual protections and insurance requirements in arrangements with TPAs; periodic monitoring of TPAs’ cybersecurity compliance and related risks; and consideration of whether to utilize the SAFETY Act, a liability management statute managed by the Department of Homeland Security, and purchase cyber and privacy insurance.
According to the brief, “Retirement plan sponsors and administrators could utilize the SAFETY Act in one of two ways: (1) by having their internal cybersecurity plans and policies SAFETY Act approved, thereby significantly limiting the possible scope of litigation claims they would face after a cyberattack; or (2) by requiring TPAs to hold SAFETY Act protections, as that would allow retirement plan sponsors and administrators to be dismissed from a broad array of claims alleging negligence or poor performance attributed to the third-party security products and services.”
4 retirement trends to watch in 2016
Original post benefitspro.com
The Institutional Retirement Income Council has announced the top four retirement industry trends to watch in 2016.
- Financial wellness plans.
According to IRIC, financial wellness will be a big one.
Employers are expected to significantly expand wellness programs that currently focus on physical wellbeing so that they also include features focusing on financial wellbeing.
With all the financial challenges faced by employees—including medical expenses, credit card debt, college expenses, and retirement planning—financial wellness programs have been growing increasingly popular, with that trend expected to continue in the year ahead.
A 2014 Society for Human Resource Management survey reported that 70 percent of HR professionals predicted that baby boomers would likely participate in a financial wellness program if their employer offered one.
Such programs will likely include not just ways to manage debt and better save for retirement, but also how to calculate a spend-down plan once in retirement and how to incorporate Social Security into one’s overall strategy.
- Out of plan or in plan?
Next is the trend that pits out-of-plan income solutions against in-plan solutions.
In their quest to be sure that retirement savings will provide a regular source of income throughout retirement, participants have been looking outside of their retirement plans to find ways to translate a lump sum into a monthly check.
However, the Department of Labor’s expected implementation of a fiduciary rule will have a major effect on out-of-plan advisors, as well as in-plan options.
The release of a Center for Retirement Research study that showed IRAs’ rate of return a poor substitute for that of defined benefit plans will, according to IRIC, “make it all the more difficult for advisors to recommend moving out of a defined contribution plan to those eligible to keep their assets in the plan.”
As a result, it expects that participants will be more likely to leave their assets in a retirement plan rather than rolling them over.
- In-plan retirement income solutions.
The move to keeping assets inside retirement plans, IRIC said, “should cause an increase in participant interest in investment vehicles that provide solutions to the draw-down, rather than accumulation, of retirement assets.”
As a result, revisiting in-plan retirement income solutions will become a major focus for plan sponsors in 2016.
IRIC said that plans that have not considered this will be under pressure from participants to “consider new solutions to address the risks of retirement income sustainability, longevity risk, market timing risk and in-plan distribution options.”
- In-plan distribution flexibility.
Plan sponsors will have to consider the question of which distribution options will be available to terminated participants.
If a plan only offers two options—complete lump-sum distribution or keeping the entire balance in the plan—it’s likely that sponsors will want to explore the possibility of offering periodic withdrawal opportunities, so that they can encourage terminated participants to keep their assets in the plan—which can provide benefits not only to the participants, but also to the plan itself in the form of reduced administration and fee costs.
Overcoming small business retirement plan hurdles
Original post Stephen Miller, shrm.org
Just one-third of U.S. companies with fewer than 20 employees offer retirement benefits, compared to nearly 98 percent of companies with 5,000 or more workers, according to Retirement Savings Trends, a research report by ADP, a payroll and benefits services firm.
Those findings dovetail with those in a new report by the Pew Charitable Trusts, Who’s In, Who’s Out, which revealed that only 22 percent of workers at organizations with fewer than 10 employers have access to a workplace savings plan, compared with 74 percent at organizations with 500 or more workers.
Earlier this week, the Obama administration announced its commitment to a series of proposals—some old, and some new—to help small businesses to provide their employees with access to retirement savings plans. But one of the largest roadblocks preventing smaller employers from offering retirement benefits is their own mistaken belief about the feasibility of doing so.
Small Business Misconceptions
“Part of the hurdle for small businesses is the myth that they have to be a large company to offer a retirement plan,” said Joe DeSilva, senior vice president and general manager of ADP retirement services in Florham Park, N.J. But “the benefits offered through a retirement plan, whether it’s a SIMPLE IRA or a 401(k) plan, can be realized regardless of company size,” he noted.
For small organizations, “their No. 1 concern is cash flow,” DeSilva said. “The thought of a 401(k) or similar plan brings on what I call a misperceived burden—that it’s going to cost them a lot of money. They worry about the incremental costs of maintaining the plan, and whether the compliance components will put them at risk.”
Often overlooked, “because it’s somewhat qualitative and not quantitative, is an employer’s ability to attract and retain talent by making available a benefit that competitors in the same market space may not offer.”
As they become better informed, small business owners may begin to see the advantage of providing retirement benefits with pre-tax dollars, and that the administrative burden is less than they might have thought.
DeSilva noted that ADP found the number of small businesses (in this instance, defined as those with under 50 employees) offering a retirement plan option rose 14 percent last year, with much of that growth occurring with SIMPLE IRAs, which is an option aimed at small employers.
Reaching Younger Workers
Both the Pew Charitable Trusts and the ADP reports revealed that younger workers—the Millennials—often aren’t taking advantage of workplace retirement plans when they are available.
Participation in 401(k) or other defined contribution plans was at 41.1 percent for employees ages 20 to 24, but rose to 65.6 percent for employees ages 55 and older, ADP reported. “The gap between access and participation proved largest among the youngest workers, many of whom face savings challenges even when they have access to retirement plans,” Pew found.
Millennials in their 20s are grappling with student loans and debt, and they’re holding off on saving. “For them, retirement is far away,” DeSilva said. “At the end of the day, you [should] combat that with overall education, driving awareness that saving early on and harnessing the power of compound interest in those low-income years when they’re entering the workforce is critical. Employers need to be telling that story.”
Automatic enrollment helps bring younger workers into a savings plan, but even when they do become participants, the level of their contributions is low. Automatic escalation—increasing the rate of salary deferral each year and requiring participants to affirmatively opt out of that increase if they so choose—can help. But while there is a high level of awareness around auto enrollment among plan sponsors, awareness of the value of auto escalation is much lower.
“Data suggests when you do auto-escalate, employees end up at retirement with larger nest eggs,” DeSilva noted.
401(k) plan participants saving more, taking out less
Original post by Paula Aven Gladych, ebn.benefitnews.com
The educational efforts of plan sponsors appear to be paying off. Participation rates in workplace retirement plans have stayed fairly constant since 2008 “due to concerted education efforts of plan sponsors and providers that set up to educate investors to stay the course through the market fluctuations,” says Hattie Greenan, director of research and communication for the Plan Sponsor Council of America.
In its 58th Annual Survey of Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plans, PSCA found that plan sponsor efforts in this arena really did keep people saving in their retirement plans.
“They may have decreased their savings rate due to economic conditions but we have seen a rebound to higher levels as people understand how plans work and realize they need to save more in their plans if they can,” she says.
In 2015, lower-paid plan participants contributed an average of 5.8 percent of their salary into their 401(k) plan, while higher-paid participants contributed an average of 6.9 percent of their salary to their workplace retirement plan.
Plan sponsors are also re-examining their 401(k) plan deferral rates. Three percent has been the standard deferral rate for years but many companies are now choosing a higher deferral percentage, in the range of 5 percent to 6 percent.
Many companies are actually pushing 10 percent to 15 percent, Greenan says. “We are shifting higher, which is good news. We may see it hit 6 percent or higher in the next couple of years.”
The survey also found that there has been a decreased usage of plan loans over the past year. A very low percentage, 0.7 percent of all assets, has been withdrawn from workplace plans and the bulk of those loans are being repaid, Greenan says.
“We’ve always been a proponent of plan loans as an incentive to participate in the plan. They know the money is available to them if they need it. It is their money and there in an emergency situation if they need it,” she says.
And while plan participants did take loans from their retirement plans during the downturn, that rate is going back down.
“The loans are functioning as intended: a safety net in emergency situations, and they are repaying those loans. They are not taking money out and abusing the system,” she says.
Another highlight of the survey was the increase in use by plan sponsors of mobile technology to communicate with a younger demographic of employees. Twenty-one percent of all plans and one-third of plans with more than 5,000 participants are using mobile technology to do everything from handle enrollments to making investment changes.
“I think it took a while for the industry to figure out how best to use the technology everyone is using,” says Greenan. “Now there are platforms for doing so, so we will see a pretty steep uptake in technology to reach plan participants in the next couple of years.”
As far as 401(k) plan design goes, more companies are offering Roth options and automatic features, such as auto enrollment and auto escalation. The increase in 2015 wasn’t quite as dramatic as in previous years, but those numbers are still increasing.
Paula Aven Gladych is a freelance writer based in Denver.