Three PPACA Coverage Terms Explained
Source: United Benefit Advisors
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) uses terms that sound alike for three very different things. Here’s a closer look at these terms, and when they’re used.
Essential Health Benefits
Significantly affects individuals and small employers with a fully insured plan. Has a limited impact on self-funded and large insured plans.
Beginning in 2014, policies in the individual and small group markets* will be required to provide coverage for each of the 10 “essential health benefits” regardless whether the policy is purchased through or outside the exchange. Self-funded plans (regardless of size), large group plans, and grandfathered plans (regardless of size) do not have to cover all 10 essential health benefits, but they will not be allowed to put lifetime or annual dollar limits on an essential health benefit.
Each state will have its own “benchmark” essential health benefits package. The essential health benefit categories are ambulatory/outpatient, emergency, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use, prescription drugs, rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices (for example, speech, physical and occupational therapy), laboratory services, preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management, and pediatric services, including pediatric dental and vision care.
Minimum Essential Coverage
Affects most individuals and all employers with 50 or more employees (regardless whether its plan is self-funded or fully insured).
Beginning in 2014, most Americans will be required to have “minimum essential coverage” or pay a penalty with their tax return. (In 2014, the penalty will be the greater of 1 percent of income or $95.) A person will have minimum essential coverage if he or she is covered under an eligible employer-sponsored plan, an individual policy (through or outside the exchange), or a government plan (Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, TRICARE, VA, etc.).
Also beginning in 2014, employers with 50 or more full-time or full-time equivalent employees will be required to offer minimum essential coverage to nearly all of their employees who work 30 or more hours a week, or pay a penalty. (If minimum essential coverage isn’t offered to at least 95 percent of full-time employees and their dependent children, a penalty of $2,000 per year per full-time employee, excluding 30 full-time employees, will apply.)
A clear definition of “minimum essential coverage” for employer-provided benefits has not been provided yet, but it appears that fairly basic medical coverage will be enough. “Eligible employer-sponsored coverage” includes any plan offered in the small or large group market in a state, as well as self-funded plans, unless the plan only provides “excepted benefits.” Excepted benefits are those that provide very limited medical coverage, like hospital indemnity, long-term care and cancer plans, on-site medical clinics, disability income and accident plans, and dental- and vision-only coverage. Plans with annual dollar limits on essential health benefits will not be allowed after 2014, so it is unlikely that a standalone HRA will provide minimum essential coverage.
Minimum Value Coverage
Affects employers with 50 or more employees (regardless whether its plan is self-funded or fully insured) and individuals who may be eligible for premium tax credits/subsidies.
Beginning in 2014, employers with 50 or more full-time or full-time equivalent employees that offer coverage that is less than “minimum value” will have to pay a penalty. (The penalty for not providing minimum value, affordable coverage is $3,000 for each full-time employee who obtains coverage through a public exchange and receives a premium tax credit/subsidy. Individuals will not be eligible for a subsidy if their employer offers them affordable, minimum value coverage.)
Minimum value coverage is coverage with an actuarial value of at least 60 percent – this means that on average the plan is designed to pay at least 60 percent of covered charges. (The employee would be responsible for the other 40 percent through the deductible, copays and coinsurance.) In the self-funded and large markets, employers will be able to use a calculator provided by the government, and possibly safe harbor plan designs, to make sure their plan meets the 60 percent standard. The proposed calculator can be found here (under the “Plan Management” section, look for Feb. 20, 2013 / Minimum Value Calculator): Regulations and Guidance | cciio.cms.gov. According to HHS, 97 percent of the employer-sponsored plans they surveyed already meet the 60 percent requirement.
In the individual and small group markets, a “bronze” policy will have an actuarial value of 60 percent.
In a nutshell, then:
- Essential health benefits are the kinds of care small plans must cover
- Minimum essential coverage is what individuals must have and large employers must offer if they don’t want to pay tax penalties
- Minimum value coverage is what large employers must offer to avoid a different tax penalty
* It is still unclear what size makes a plan “large” or “small” under the essential health benefits rules. Clearly, a plan with fewer than 50 employees is “small” and a plan with more than 100 employees is “large.” States have the option to consider plans below 100 as “small” until 2016, but it is not clear yet how they make that choice. (It is clear that a plan is “large” under the minimum essential and minimum value requirements if there are 50 or more full-time or full-time equivalent employees in its control group.)
Obama to Propose Cuts to Social Security
Source: https://www.benefitspro.com
By Jim Kuhnhenn
President Barack Obama's proposed budget will call for reductions in the growth of Social Security and other benefit programs while still insisting on more taxes from the wealthy in a renewed attempt to strike a broad deficit-cutting deal with Republicans, a senior administration official says.
The proposal aims for a compromise on the Fiscal 2014 budget by combining the president's demand for higher taxes with GOP insistence on reductions in entitlement programs.
The official, who spoke on a condition of anonymity to describe a budget that has yet to be released, said Obama would reduce the federal government deficit by $1.8 trillion over 10 years. The president's budget, the first of his second term, incorporates elements from his last offer to House Speaker John Boehner in December. Congressional Republicans rejected that proposal because of its demand for more than a $1 trillion in tax revenue.
A key feature of the plan Obama now is submitting for the federal budget year beginning Oct. 1 is a revised inflation adjustment called "chained CPI." This new formula would effectively curb annual increases in a broad swath of government programs, but would have its biggest impact on Social Security. By encompassing Obama's offer to Boehner, R-Ohio, the plan will also include reductions in Medicare spending, much of it by targeting payments to health care providers and drug companies.
Obama's budget proposal also calls for additional tax revenue, including a proposal to place limits on tax-preferred retirement accounts for wealthy taxpayers. Obama has also called for limits on tax deductions by the wealthy, a proposal that could generate about $580 billion in revenue over 10 years.
The inflation adjustment would reduce federal spending over 10 years by about $130 billion, according to past White House estimates. Because it also affects how tax brackets are adjusted, it would also generate about $100 billion in higher taxes and affect even middle income taxpayers.
The reductions in the growth of benefit programs, which would affect veterans, the poor and the older Americans, is sure to anger many Democrats. Labor groups and liberals have long been critical of Obama's offer to Boehner for including such a plan.
Administration officials have said Obama would only agree to the reductions in benefit programs if they are accompanied by increases in revenue, a difficult demand given the strong anti-tax sentiment of House Republicans.
That Obama would include such a plan in his budget is hardly surprising. White House aides have said for weeks that the president's offer to Boehner in December remained on the table. Not including it in the budget would have constituted a remarkable retreat from his bargaining position.
Obama's budget, to be released next Wednesday, comes after the Republican-controlled House and the Democratic-run Senate passed separate and markedly different budget proposals. House Republicans achieved long-term deficit reductions by targeting safety net programs; Democrats instead protected those programs and called for $1 trillion in tax increases.
But Obama has been making a concerted effort to win Republican support, especially in the Senate. He has even scheduled a dinner with Republican lawmakers on the evening that his budget is released next week.
House Republicans, however, have been adamant in their opposition to increases in taxes, noting that Congress already increased taxes on the wealthy in the first days of January to avoid a so-called fiscal cliff, or automatic, across the board tax increases and spending cuts.
Congress and the administration have already secured $2.5 trillion in deficit reduction over the next 10 years through budget reductions and with the end-of-year tax increase on the rich. Obama's plan would bring that total to $4.3 trillion over 10 years.
As described by the administration official, the budget proposal would also end a loophole that permits people to obtain unemployment insurance and disability benefits at the same time.
Obama's proposal, however, includes calls for increased spending. It would make pre-school available to more children by increasing the tax on tobacco.
Young Adults Should Have Reasonable Plan Options On Exchanges
Source: https://www.kaiserhealthnews.org
By Michelle Andrews
As landmark dates approach in the health-care overhaul, readers are trying to figure out how the new insurance exchanges will work. Here are some recent questions:
Q. After the exchanges go live in 2014, will consumers still be able to buy individual health insurance directly from carriers, without going through those state-based marketplaces? I fear the rules of the plans operating within the exchange will make the premiums unnecessarily high for younger, healthy people.
A. Consumers will be able to buy individual health insurance next year either through the state insurance exchanges or on the private market. Regardless of where they buy a plan, however, all new individual policies will have to meet certain standards related to coverage and cost.
Under the law, premiums for older people cannot be more than three times higher than those for younger ones. Currently, the gap between how much younger, typically healthier people pay for coverage and how much older people pay is larger than that, leading some experts to predict that younger people's rates will skyrocket next year.
An analysis published last month by the Urban Institute suggests that will not happen. Although premiums will be higher for many young people under the new rules, this increase will have very little impact on their out-of-pocket costs, the study found. The reason: The vast majority of young people will be eligible for subsidized coverage -- through the exchanges, Medicaid or their parents' health plans. On the health insurance exchanges, premium subsidies will be available to people with incomes up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level -- $45,960 for an individual in 2013.
"If you're young, you do want to go on the exchanges because you'll qualify for subsidies," says Jen Mishory of Young Invincibles, an advocacy group.
In addition to enrolling in regular plans, people up to age 30 will have the option of using the exchanges to buy less expensive, high-deductible policies that protect primarily against catastrophic events. Although these policies might require large out-of-pocket payments by members -- the deductible probably will be more than $6,000, for starters -- they will be required to cover preventive care without any co-pay or cost sharing, and three primary-care visits will be covered even if the deductible has not been met.
Q. If employers stop providing coverage and employees have to purchase individual policies on or off the exchanges, do the employees lose the option to make pre-tax contributions to their health savings accounts?
A. You'll be able to make pre-tax contributions as long as you buy a policy that meets federal standards for plans that can be linked to health savings accounts.
This means a high-deductible policy. In 2013, HSA-qualified plans must have a deductible of at least $1,250 for individual coverage and $2,500 for a family plan, among other requirements.
The amount that individuals and their employers can contribute to the accounts limited to $3,250 and $6,450 for individual and family coverage, respectively. (The Internal Revenue Service makes cost-of-living adjustments to these and other limits annually.) Even if your employer no longer offers health insurance in 2014, any money in the HSA is yours to use for medical expenses.
Some of the policies offered on the exchanges may qualify as HSA plans, says Carrie McLean of eHealthInsurance.com, an online vendor. But it's too soon to know whether carriers will offer such plans or the exchanges will choose to carry them, she says.
Q. In 2014, can someone who works for a company drop his coverage and buy it through a state exchange instead?
A. Next year, most people will be able to choose to buy a health plan on the exchange. As I said above, individuals whose income is less than 400 percent of the federal poverty level may be eligible for a subsidy. This can make buying a policy on the exchange an attractive option.
But even if you meet the income requirements, you won't be eligible for a subsidized exchange plan unless your job-based coverage is considered unaffordable (because premiums for individual coverage cost more than 9.5 percent of the individual's income) or inadequate (because the plan covers less than 60 percent of allowed medical expenses).
Q. What's to stop people from just paying the individual mandate penalty and buying coverage when they need it, since insurers won't be able to turn them down because of a preexisting condition?
A. If you decide to drop coverage altogether, the penalty for not having insurance in 2014 will be either $95 or 1 percent of your taxable income, whichever is greater. To discourage people from waiting to buy insurance until they're sick, there will be an open enrollment period for buying coverage on the exchanges from October 2013 through March 2014. If you don't sign up during that time and you subsequently get sick, you won't be able to sign up until the following year in most cases.
Employers turn to tech for wellness
Source: https://www.benefitspro.com
By Amanda McGrory-Dixon
More employers are relying on new technologies to promote health engagement and attain targeted employee behavior changes, according to a new study by Buck Consultants and WorldatWork.
Specifically, 62 percent of respondents report using gamification and believe it is most effective, and 31 percent of respondents say they are likely to implement gamification in the next year. Fifty percent of respondents use social networking, though there are concerns over personal privacy. Another 36 percent of respondents use mobile technology, which is the least used, but 40 percent of respondents say they expect to rely on mobile technology in the future.
Additionally, 73 percent of respondents say they have implemented health engagement strategies, measure communication effective have a health engagement strategy in place and measurement of communication effectiveness, but return on investment could use more help.
While roughly half of respondents say mobile technology will be the most prevalent technology used by employers in the next two years, only 11 percent of respondents report measuring ROI on mobile apps and social media platforms, and 21 percent of respondents say they measure ROI on gamification.
“The lack of measurement is due, in part, to the fact that many companies are using third parties, such as health insurers and wellness program vendors, to handle various aspects of their wellness programs,” says Lenny Sanicola, CBP, senior benefits practice leader of WorldatWork. “These companies should direct their vendors to better engage employees and to collaborate on measuring effectiveness.”
The survey reveals that the largest obstacle from keeping respondents using these technologies is budgeting at 71 percent for gamification, 73 percent for mobile technology and 68 percent for social networking. Respondents also say lack of senior management support and no effectiveness measurements are barriers for these technologies. When it comes to social media, 43 percent of respondents say they have blocked some or all sites from employees’ computers.
“Today’s health care benefits require individuals to absorb an increasing share of expanding health care costs,” says Scot Marcotte, managing director of talent and human resources solutions at Buck Consulting. “Technology offers unprecedented ways for employers to motivate and enable employees to become more effective health care consumers. But employers need to better understand what drives their workers to make the desired changes.”
3-year anniversary: Important milestones for PPACA
Source: https://eba.benefitnews.com
By Gillian Roberts
On the third anniversary of President Barack Obama signing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, we take a quick look at important dates on the passage, implementation and ongoing struggles about the law that’s set to change America.
- March 23, 2010: The day Obama signed PPACA into effect. He reflects on that day in a statement released Saturday, “Three years ago today, I signed into law the principle that in the wealthiest nation on Earth, no one should go broke just because they get sick.”
- June, 2013: Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, made multiple media appearances at the end of last week around the anniversary. She authored a blog on the Huffington Post, discussing another step to come: “In June, the site will be unveiling the new Marketplace. You'll be able to learn everything you need to know about the Marketplace, including how it works, the benefits of health insurance, how to choose a plan based on your needs and lifestyle, and more. Then in the fall, you can use this site to enroll in a plan from home, or from any place you can access the Web.”
- Oct. 1, 2013: The day the state, federal and partnership exchanges are scheduled to begin open enrollment for those who are currently uninsured or looking to switch to the exchanges. There has been growing speculation growing over the amount of work HHS has yet to do to meet this deadline. Earlier in March the executive director of the National Governors Association, Dan Crippen, told a crowd of carriers at AHIP’s policy conference that there is a chance some of the exchanges won’t be ready by Oct. 1, but HHS will continue to work hard towards the deadline.
- Jan. 1, 2014: The day coverage begins for those who have enrolled on the public exchanges. The Congressional Budget Office released updated predictions in February of this year that 6 - 7 million people will gain coverage on the exchange in the first year. This is a decrease of 13 million people from CBO’s initial projections about health reform in March 2010.
The Affordable Care Act Three Years Post-Enactment
Source: https://www.kff.org
Three years ago, on March 23, 2010, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was signed into law. Although the date for full implementation of most provisions of the law is January 1, 2014, the ACA has already had an impact on the goals of expanded coverage of the uninsured, improved access and better care delivery models, broader access to community-based long-term care, and more integrated care and financing for beneficiaries who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Although the ACA remains controversial, with many debates about its future as well as provisions already implemented, implementation is proceeding.
Much remains to be put in place leading up to 2014. This brief summarizes ACA-related activities to date in terms of tangible benefits and policy changes on the ground with respect to private insurance and Exchanges, Medicaid coverage, access to primary care, preventive care, Medicare, and Medicare and Medicaid dual eligible beneficiaries.
Private Insurance and Exchanges
- Young adults up to age 26 can stay on their parents’ insurance policies. Young adults can qualify for this coverage even if they are no longer living with a parent, are not a dependent on a parent’s tax return, or are no longer a student. Census data show that over two million young adults have gained coverage, contributing to the decline of 1.3 million in the number of uninsured Americans in 2011.
- Many states are moving forward with building new health insurance marketplaces. To date, 17 states and the District of Columbia are establishing state-based health insurance exchanges while another seven states will partner with the federal government to run their exchanges. These states are making critical decisions about how insurers will participate in the exchanges, what types and how many plans will be offered, and what types of consumer assistance will be available to help people enroll in coverage. States are also building the IT infrastructure for the exchanges to be ready when open enrollment begins on October 1. In the remaining 26 states, the federal government will operate a federally-facilitated exchange, and residents will get the same benefits and tax subsidies as in states operating their own Exchanges.
- Coverage exclusions for children with pre-existing conditions were prohibited as of September 23, 2010. Insurers are no longer permitted to deny coverage to children due to their health status, or exclude coverage for pre-existing conditions. Protections for adults will take effect in 2014. In addition, lifetime limits on coverage in private insurance have been eliminated and annual limits are being phased out.
- Medical loss ratio and rate review requirements are improving value and lowering premium growth for consumers. Medical loss ratio standards require insurers to spend 80-85% of premium dollars on direct medical care instead of on administrative costs, marketing, or profits, or pay rebates back to consumers. Failure to meet these standards has resulted in insurer payments of over $1 billion in rebates to consumers. In addition, expanded review of insurance premium increases by states and the federal government has led to some rate increases requested by insurers being denied, withdrawn, or lowered, which has slowed overall premium growth.
- All health plans must provide a standardized, easy-to-read Summary of benefits and Coverage (SBC). The SBC gives consumers consistent information about what health plans cover and what limits, exclusions, and cost-sharing apply. It includes illustrations of how coverage works by estimating what a plan would pay and what consumers would be left to pay for common health care needs such as an uncomplicated pregnancy or management of diabetes. Kaiser Family Foundation tracking polls indicate the SBC is one of the most popular provisions in the ACA.
Medicaid coverage
- More than half the Governors have announced support for the Medicaid expansion. Twenty-seven Governors intend to implement the Medicaid expansion. Another seven are still weighing their options. Seventeen Governors have stated their opposition to the expansion.
- Seven states have expanded Medicaid to adults since the enactment of the ACA, helping to build on the very limited base of coverage available to low-income adults today. While the enhanced federal funding for the ACA Medicaid expansion to low-income adults does not take effect until January 1, 2014, seven states – CA, CO, CT, DC, MN, NJ, and WA – have used the ACA option to expand Medicaid earlier at their regular match rate, or used Section 1115 waiver authority to do so. Nearly all these states previously covered low-income adults using state-only dollars, but transitioning that coverage to Medicaid enabled them to preserve and, in some cases, expand adult coverage by securing federal matching funds.
- Medicaid and CHIP have remained primary sources of coverage for low-income children and pregnant women. To help preserve the existing base of coverage in the period leading up to the coverage expansions in 2014, the ACA required states to maintain the Medicaid and CHIP eligibility, enrollment, and renewal policies they had in place when the ACA was enacted. Notwithstanding the recent recession and state budget pressures, eligibility for these programs has remained largely stable, and the programs have remained primary sources of coverage for low-income children and pregnant women. The preservation of Medicaid and CHIP coverage has been important to progress in reducing the number of uninsured Americans – which declined by 1.3 million in 2011.
- Nearly all states are modernizing and streamlining their Medicaid enrollment systems. Taking advantage of a time-limited 90% federal match rate available for systems development, almost all states are already moving forward with major improvements to their information technology (IT) infrastructure to prepare for the ACA’s new streamlined, coordinated enrollment system. In addition, an increasing number of states – now totaling 37 – have implemented an electronic online application in Medicaid or CHIP, and the number of states with an online renewal process rose from 20 in 2011 to 28 in 2012. Over two-thirds of states now provide online accounts.
- Ten states have adopted the ACA’s new Medicaid option to provide health homes for those with chronic conditions or serious mental illness. Another five states plan to implement health homes. Health homes are among the ACA’s broader set of initiatives to improve care and better manage spending for people with complex and high-cost needs. Building on patient-centered medical homes, health homes incorporate comprehensive care management, health promotion, transitional care, and other services and supports to provide more integrated, “whole person” care for Medicaid beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions or a serious and persistent mental illness.
- States are taking advantage of new and expanded opportunities to provide home and community-based long-term services. Many people with long-term care needs prefer to receive services at home or in the community rather than in institutional settings, and home and community-based services (HCBS) are often less expensive. The ACA expands states’ opportunities to rebalance their long-term care programs toward community-based care and provides new federal funding for this purpose. A total of 46 states, including DC, have received federal grant money to transition Medicaid beneficiaries from institutions back to their homes or community-based settings through the “Money Follows the Person” demonstration program, which the ACA extended. Sixteen of these states first undertook a demonstration this past year. A growing number of states – 25 currently – are responding to other new flexibility and federal financial incentives the ACA provided to increase access to HCBS.
Access to Primary care
- Primary care providers get increased Medicare and Medicaid payment rates under the ACA. The ACA provides for a 10% bonus payment on top of the regular Medicare fee schedule amount for many primary care services provided by primary care physicians (and other practitioners) from 2011 through 2015. The law also requires states to raise their Medicaid payment rates in 2013 and 2014 to Medicare payment levels for many primary care physician services. As a result, Medicaid primary care fees will increase by 73%, on average, in 2013 although the size of the increase will vary by state. The Medicaid increase is fully federally funded up to the difference between states’ July 1, 2009 fees and Medicare fees in 2013 and 2014.
- Because of new ACA investments in the health center program, health centers’ patient capacity has expanded. The ACA created a five-year $11 billion Health Center Trust Fund to support health center growth in preparation for the coverage expansion beginning in 2014. Drawing on this fund, health centers are serving an additional 1.5 million patients, and they have been able to maintain their capacity to serve another 2.2 million patients whom they were earlier able to reach only because of a (now-expired) temporary increase in federal funding when the recession was at its deepest. In addition, over 700 health centers received grants for capital improvements from funds provided by the ACA for this purpose.
- Thousands of new primary care providers have been added to the ranks of the national health Service Corps (nhSC), bolstering the health care workforce in medically under served communities. The ACA provided increased funding of $1.5 billion for the NHSC, which provides loan repayment to medical students and others in exchange for service in low-income under served communities. Health centers, which serve millions of people in these communities, rely heavily on the NHSC to recruit their physicians, dentists, and other health care professionals. As a result of the ACA investment and earlier investments by the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009, the number of NHSC clinicians is at an all-time high – triple the number in 2008.Today nearly 10,000 NHSC providers are providing primary care to approximately 10.4 million people at nearly 14,000 health care sites in urban, rural, and frontier areas.
- Additional efforts to expand the primary care workforce are also underway. New training and retention programs have also been created to develop and strengthen the primary care workforce. The ACA has increased the number of graduate medical education residency programs, including establishing 11 Teaching Health Centers to support primary care training in ambulatory care settings. Other efforts include investments in training for nurses and physician assistants, and financial support for nurse-managed clinics.
- KFF resource:
Access to Preventive Services
- Preventive benefits with no patient cost-sharing are now required in Medicare and private insurance (except for grandfathered plans). The benefits that must be covered include services found to be effective by the USPSTF, immunizations for adults and children endorsed by the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and pediatric services recommend by HRSA’s Bright Futures for Children. Private plans must cover additional preventive services for women without cost-sharing, including all FDA-approved contraceptive methods (non-profit, religious employers that object to that requirement are exempt) and at least one annual well-woman visit. HHS estimates that, as a result of the ACA, 71 million children and adults with private insurance, and 34 million Medicare beneficiaries have received no-cost preventive care. Enhanced federal matching funds in Medicaid are available to states providing all USPSTF-recommended preventive benefits without cost-sharing, but, to date, few states have made the changes required to gain the higher match rate.
- The ACA supports population-based prevention activities through a new Prevention and Public health fund. This Fund has been used to make over $1 billion in critical investments in programs aimed at reducing the burden of chronic disease and improving the overall health of communities. Funding has supported Community Transformation Grants in 36 states to reduce the incidence of heart attacks, strokes, cancer, and other diseases; rebuilding the immunization infrastructure; tobacco cessation programs; and substance abuse and suicide prevention activities.
- KFF resource:
Medicare
- Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Part d drug plans are receiving additional help with their “doughnut hole” prescription drug costs. The ACA required drug manufacturers to offer a 50% discount on brand-name drugs in the coverage gap phase of the Medicare drug benefit, known as the “doughnut hole,” beginning in 2011. It also required Part D plans to offer additional coverage for brand-name and generic drugs for enrollees who reach the coverage gap, and phases out the gap by 2020. In 2013, plans pay for 21% of the cost of generic drugs and 2.5% of the cost of brands, on top of the 50% manufacturer discount. According to HHS, as of March 2013, 6.3 million Medicare beneficiaries have saved over $6.1 billion on prescription drugs in the Medicare Part D doughnut hole since the ACA was enacted.
- New initiatives testing delivery system and payment reforms are being developed and implemented rapidly around the country, including Accountable Care organizations (ACos) and bundled payments. The ACA established a new Center on Medicare and Medicaid Innovation charged with reducing costs in Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP while preserving or enhancing quality of care. The Innovation Center develops, tests, and supports new delivery models to increase coordination of care and improve quality, along with new payment systems to encourage more value-based care and move away from fee-for-service payment. For example, the Innovation Center has approved more than 250 ACOs to participate in the Medicare Shared Savings Program in 47 states and territories; these ACOs cover more than four million beneficiaries in traditional Medicare.
- Medicare savings in the ACA have helped extend the solvency of the Medicare Part A trust fund. The ACA included Medicare savings measures that were projected to reduce growth in Medicare spending over time. The measures included reduced payments to Medicare Advantage plans, smaller updates in payment levels to hospitals and other providers, and increased premiums for higher-income beneficiaries. These changes, along with a payroll tax increase for higher-income taxpayers, contributed to the extended solvency of the Medicare Part A trust fund. Medicare spending per beneficiary is projected to grow more slowly than private health insurance spending per capita over the next decade, and premiums and cost-sharing for many Medicare-covered services are lower than what they would be without the ACA.
Medicare and Medicaid Dual Eligible Beneficiaries
- Many states have responded to the ACA initiative to develop and test models that align Medicare and Medicaid financing for dually eligible beneficiaries. About 9 million seniors and younger people with significant disabilities are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Many have complex medical and long term care needs and they account for a disproportionate share of spending in both programs. A total of 26 states responded to a CMS solicitation for proposals to test models that align Medicare and Medicaid financing for this population; four of these states now have memoranda of understanding approved to implement demonstrations in 2013, and another 21 proposals are pending CMS’s approval.
HHS finalizes Medicaid rule
Source: https://www.benefitspro.com
By Kathryn Mayer
Health officials on Friday issued a final rule guaranteeing 100 percent funding for new Medicaid beneficiaries as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Health reform authorizes states to expand Medicaid to adult Americans under age 65 with income of up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level—about $15,000 for a single adult in 2012—and provides unprecedented federal funding for these states.
Under the new regulations, the federal government will pay all of the cost of certain newly eligible adult Medicaid beneficiaries through 2016, phasing down to a permanent 90 percent matching rate by 2020. It will remain there permanently.
The rule, issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, will take effect in January of next year.
“This is a great deal for states and great news for Americans,” HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said. “Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, more Americans will have access to health coverage and the federal government will cover a vast majority of the cost. Treating people who don’t have insurance coverage raises health care costs for hospitals, people with insurance, and state budgets.”
HHS said the rule builds on several years of work that the department has done to support and provide flexibility to states’ Medicaid programs ahead of the 2014 expansion. The rule also offers more collaboration with states on audits that track down fraud and outlines ways states can make Medicaid improvements without going through a waiver process, HHS said in comments.
The administration will take comments from interested parties and the public for 60 days. The full text of the rule can be found here.
New IRS Plan Correction Program Effective April 1
Source: https://ebn.benefitnews.com
On the last day of 2012 the IRS updated the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS), published as Rev. Proc 2013-12. The program allows plan sponsors to declare, fix and pay penalties (where applicable) for certain operational or demographic missteps under the “voluntary correction program” (VCP).
The revisions, effective April 1, “include changes and additional guidance with respect to correction methods as well as procedural changes for VCP submissions,” according to a client bulletin by the law firm Drinker Biddle. According to that document, authored by Sharon L. Klingelsmith and Heather B. Abrigo, changes to the program include the following:
Corrective contributions for excluded employees in 401(k) plans. “Previously all corrective matching contributions and, if the plan used nonelective contributions to satisfy a safe harbor, all corrective nonelective contributions, related to missed deferrals for an excluded employee were required to be made in the form of a qualified nonelective contribution ‘(QNEC)’ which is a nonforfeitable (i.e., fully vested) contribution. Except for corrective matching and nonelective contributions used to satisfy the safe harbor requirements under section 401(k)(12) of the Code, contribution in the form of a QNEC is no longer required for corrective matching and nonelective contributions,” according to the authors.
Overpayments from defined contribution plans. “If a defined contribution plan overpays benefits, in most cases, the plan sponsor must request that the participant return the overpayment to the plan. Rev. Proc. 2008-50 provided that the participant should repay the overpaid amount with appropriate interest but that the employer was required to make up any amount not repaid by the employee with interest at the plan’s earnings rate. Rev. Proc. 2013-12 now also requires the plan’s earnings rate to be used for participant repayments. In addition, if the reason for the overpayment is the lack of a distributable event, the plan sponsor is not required to make a contribution to the plan even if the participant does not repay the overpayment,” Klingelsmith and Abrigo write.
Finding Missing Participants. “The IRS has discontinued the IRS Letter Forwarding Program as a method for finding lost plan participants who are owed retirement plan benefits. Rev. Proc. 2013-12 provides the following methods to locate missing participants should certified mail not result in success: (i) Social Security letter forwarding program; (ii) a commercial locator service; (iii) a credit reporting agency; or (iv) Internet search tools.”
These changes offer a glimpse of the complete Drinker Biddle report, which advisers may wish to call the attention of their clients.
Moving beyond baby steps with wellness
Source: https://ebn.benefitnews.com
By Samuel H. Fleet
Employers want to do the right thing when it comes to health benefits for their employees, not only because it is humane, but also because it makes good business sense to take care of their most important assets. As health benefits have become increasingly costly, employers have struggled to find the key to meeting healthcare needs without breaking the bank. Many have pinned their hopes on wellness initiatives, the most popular offerings including newsletters and websites, weight-loss programs and smoking cessation programs.
Why baby steps are not enough
The earliest wellness initiatives were grounded in the concept that once employees are confronted with information about unhealthy behaviors they will make improvements that will lead to better health.
Information alone, however, is rarely enough to make a difference. Employers are beginning to face the hard truth that giving employees access to wellness support has done little to change the overall health of their workforces. To reach that goal, they have to move beyond providing information to a much more effective level of wellness support: Employee health risk management.
Tying consequences to health risk management
Employee Health Risk Management is an approach that allows employers to actively manage the health risks of their employees. Among the tools are health risk assessments and biometric health screenings to help identify risks that are driving healthcare expenses.
When made mandatory for employees, these tools can be coupled with consequences. Instead of appealing to reason (“if you exercise, you will be healthier”), these advanced wellness initiatives provide both carrots and sticks to link an employee’s actions and outcomes to consequences. For example, people who continue to smoke even after having access to cessation support pay higher premiums for their health care. Or people who join a gym and use it three times a week pay lower premiums. Or a person who agrees to regular cholesterol and blood pressure screening earns an annual bonus. Ultimately the goal is to implement value-based plan designs tailor-made for employee populations.
Finding the right partner
When plans are well-designed, the requirements are both attainable and accompanied by support to help employees succeed. For example, a well-designed plan does not ask an employee to reduce Body Mass Index from 40 to 25 in one year. A 10% or 15% reduction goal, supported by free access to plans like Weight Watchers, and supported with rewards and recognition may inspire the behavioral changes that will lead to a lower BMI with little further encouragement.
Wellness initiatives have always had the right idea: a healthy workforce costs less when it comes to health care benefits. But until recently, most have stopped short of the hard work it takes to get people to change their habits and lifestyles. In the era of health care reform, smart employers are stepping up their wellness efforts to make them more effective, and brokers are leading the way with cost-effective solutions. Now is the time to move beyond baby steps and actively manage the health and well-being of employees and their dependents.
Offer Your Employees Financial Wellness With Lunch
Your employees have seen a reduction in their pay. Likely a reduction that they couldn't afford to see. We want to educate them as to why and how they can leverage these changes to help plan their futures and ensure their financial wellness. Show them that their company understands the impact this payroll tax change has had at home and that you are there to help them. It is important that they know your company is not the root of the issue.
It's Easy!
Your employees will participate in a survey, either online or on paper. We won't gather any personal information. We are just looking to fully understand how your employees feel about their financial wellness and the areas they feel they need education.
We Do All the Work!
We will compile the results and provide those to you so to see the areas of need. The results are yours to keep to use in any way you choose in your efforts to better assist and educate your work force.
Employees Get Fed!
That's Right! We will not only come on-site and provide lunch, but we will also feed your employees with financial education based on the information we gathered from the survey.
[button color="#ffffff" background="#1c531e" size="large" src="https://marketing.experience-6.com/acton/form/1515/0110:/1/1515:e-04ea-1303/-/l-tst/l-tst:5/index.htm?utm_medium=email&utm_source=Act-On+Software&utm_content=email&utm_campaign=Don%27t&utm_term=Saxon%3A%20Request%20a%20lunch%20and%20learn%20on-site%20financial%20wellness%20workshop&cm_mmc=Act-On%20Software-_-email-_-Don%27t-_-Saxon%3A%20Request%20a%20lunch%20and%20learn%20on-site%20financial%20wellness%20workshop"]Request a No Cost Financial Wellness Workshop[/button]