9 reasons why retirement may go extinct
Worried about your future retirement? Check out this great read by Marlene Satter
Retirement as we know it may be set to disappear, as younger people look for ways to finance surviving into old age.
But extinction? Surely not.
However, according to the Merrill Edge Report 2016, that might just be in the offing, as workers change how they plan and save for retirement and how they intend to pay for it.
Millennials in particular represent a shift in attitude that includes very unretirement-like plans, although GenXers too are struggling with ways to pay their way through their golden years.
That’s tough, considering that most Americans neither know nor correctly estimate how much money they might need to keep the wolf from the door during retirement—or even to retire at all.
Here’s a look at 9 reasons why retirement as we know it today might be a terminal case—unless things change drastically, and soon.
9. Ignorance.
Most Americans have no idea how much they might need to retire, which leaves them behind the eight ball when trying to figure out when or whether they can afford to do so.
Of course, it’s hardly surprising, considering how many are members of the “sandwich generation,” who find themselves caring for elderly parents while at the same time raising kids, or even trying to put those kids through college.
With soaring medical costs on one end and soaring student debt on the other, not to mention parents supporting adult children who have come home to roost, it’s hard to figure out how much they’ll need to meet all their obligations, much less try to save some of an already-stretched income to cover retirement savings as well.
8. Poor calculations.
We already know most workers don’t know how much they’ll need in retirement—but it’s not just a matter of ignorance. They don’t know how to figure it out, either.
More than half—56 percent—figure they’ll be able to get by during retirement on a million dollars or less, while 9 percent overall think up to $100,000 will see them through.
And 19 percent just flat-out say they don’t know how much they’ll need.
Considering that health care costs alone can cost them a quarter of a mil during retirement, the optimists who think they can get by on $100,000 or less and even those who figure $100,000–$500,000 will do the job are way too optimistic—particularly since saving for medical costs isn’t one of their top priorities.
7. Despair.
It’s pretty hard to get motivated about something if you think it’s not achievable—and that discourages a lot of people from saving for retirement.
Those who have a “magic number” that they think will see them through retirement aren’t all that optimistic about being able to achieve that level of savings, with 40 percent of nonretired workers saying that reaching their magic number by retirement will either be “difficult” or “virtually unattainable.”
6. Luck.
When you don’t believe you can do it on your own, what else is left? Sheer dumb luck, to quote Professor Minerva McGonagall at Hogwarts after Harry and Ron defeated the troll.
Only instead of magic wands, 17 percent of would-be retirees are sadly (and amazingly) counting on winning the lottery to get them to their goal.
5. The gig economy.
Retirement? What retirement? Millennials in particular think they’ll need side jobs in the gig economy to keep them from the cat food brigade.
In addition, exactly half of younger millennials aged 18–24 believe they need to take on a side job to reach their retirement goals, compared with only 25 percent of all respondents. They don’t believe that just one job will cut it any more.
4. Attitude adjustment.
While 83 percent of current retirees are not currently working or never have during their golden years, the majority (83 percent) of millennials plan to work in retirement—whether for income, to keep busy or to pursue a passion.
The rise of the “gig economy" has created an environment where temporary positions and short-term projects are more prevalent and employee benefits such as retirement plans are less certain. This may be why more millennials (15 percent) are likely to rank an employer’s retirement plan as the most important factor when taking a new job compared with GenXers (5 percent) and baby boomers (5 percent).
Older generations had unions to negotiate benefits for them. Millennials might realize they have to do it all themselves, but they aren’t negotiating for salaries high enough to allow them to save.
And union benefits or not, 64 percent of boomers, 79 percent of Gen Xers and even 17 percent of currently retired workers plan to work in retirement.
3. A failure to communicate.
Lack of communications is probably not surprising, since most people won’t talk about savings anyway.
Fifty-four percent of respondents say that the only person they feel comfortable discussing their current retirement savings with is their spouse or partner. Only 36 percent would discuss the subject with family, and only 22 percent would talk with friends about it.
And as for coworkers? Just 6 percent would talk about retirement savings with colleagues—although more communication on the topic no doubt could provide quite an education on both sides of the discussion.
2. Misplaced confidence.
They won’t talk about it, but they think they do better than others at saving for retirement. How might that be, when they don’t know what others are doing about retirement?
Forty-three percent of workers say they are better at saving than their friends, while 28 percent believe they’re doing better at it than coworkers; 27 percent think they’re doing better than their spouse or partner, 27 percent say they’re doing better than their parents and 24 percent say they’re beating out their siblings.
All without talking about it.
1. DIY.
They’re struggling to figure out how much they need, many won’t talk about retirement savings even with those closest to them and they’re anticipating working into retirement—but millennials in particular are taking a more hands-on approach to their investments.
Doing it oneself could actually be a good thing, since it could mean the 70 percent of millennials, 72 percent of GenXers and 57 percent of boomers who are taking the reins into their own hands better understand what they’re investing in and how they need to structure their portfolios.
However, doing it oneself without sufficient understanding—and millennials in particular are also most likely to describe their investment personality as “DIY,” with 32 percent making their own rules when it comes to investments, compared to 19 percent of all respondents—can be a problem.
After all, as the saying goes, “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.”
See the original article Here.
Source:
Satter M. (2016 December 7). 9 reasons why retirement may go extinct[Web blog post]. Retrieved from address https://www.benefitspro.com/2016/12/07/9-reasons-why-retirement-may-go-extinct?ref=mostpopular&page_all=1
3 ways to help employees with retirement planning
by Marlene Satter
Lack of confidence, lack of knowledge and lack of money all plague workers trying to save for retirement, leaving them working longer than they planned and saving considerably less than they need.
But a series of surveys from TIAA has identified three ways that plan sponsors can help to improve retirement outcomes for their employees.
Employees want income for life, for instance, with 49 percent saying that their retirement plan’s top goal should be providing guaranteed monthly income in retirement.
And although it’s something they badly want, 41 percent are unsure if their current plan has that as an option.
1. Employees need help figuring how much retirement income they'll need and how to translate savings into income - Plan sponsors can help with this, said the data, by helping employees be realistic about how much income they’ll need in retirement—something few have figured out.
While 63 percent of Americans who are not retired estimate that they’ll need less than 75 percent of their current income to live comfortably, most experts recommend replacing 70–100 percent of current income in retirement.
Compounding the situation is the fact that 53 percent of employees haven’t even figured out how to translate their savings into income—while 41 percent of people who haven’t yet retired are saving less (many considerably less) than the 10–15 percent of income experts recommend.
Lifetime income options such as annuities are one way to guarantee income replacement during retirement, but most people are unaware of them or of how they work. Just 10 percent of Americans have annuities, so for the other 90 percent, they’re not an option.
2. Employees are interested in receiving financial advice - Sponsors can also offer financial advice as part of a benefits package.
While 61 percent of those who have received advice feel confident about their financial situation, just 37 percent of people who haven’t feel that way.
But the cost—or perceived cost—of seeking advice is putting them off, as is distrust of advisors in general.
Although 71 percent of Americans say they’re interested in receiving advice, more than half haven’t.
For instance, 35 percent of Americans who have not worked with a professional financial advisor say they don’t think they have enough money to justify a meeting; 51 percent say they don’t have enough money to invest (49 percent believe they need more than $50,000 in savings to get an advisor to talk with them), while 45 percent have concerns about cost and affordability.
And 34 percent don’t know whom they can trust.
3. Employees can use tools and resources early and in all stages of retirement planning - Last but not least, the study found that getting involved early in the planning process can make a difference.
Sponsors who introduce resources for all stages of the financial planning process, with customizable planning tools and tailored support based on employees’ life stages, can help employees consider what they need to do to prepare for retirement, even if that day is years away.
Such tools can make it easier for employees to evaluate their personal risk tolerance, asset allocation and the current status of Social Security and Medicare to help them better envision their future retirement and the steps they can take to make sure that their retirement is successful
See the original article Here.
Source:
Satter M.(2016 December 8). 3 ways to help employees with retirement planning[Web blog post]. Retrieved from address https://www.benefitspro.com/2016/12/08/3-ways-to-help-employees-with-retirement-planning?ref=hp-news
5 ways to salvage retirement
It’s a scary season, what with Halloween just around the corner, and some of the fears looming large in people’s minds focus on retirement. So it’s probably pretty appropriate that we tackle some of those fears head on, so to speak.
The Huffington Post addressed just that topic, pointing out five things people who are not yet retired can do to ward off at least some of the effects of what experts predict: that people’s standard of living will fall during retirement, thanks to low savings levels and poor planning for the last stages of life.
We scouted around the web to find some additional data on why, and how, retirement is expected to fall so short of people’s anticipation, and what they might be able to do to forestall that drop in expectations. Here’s what we found:
5. Figure out where you’ll live
A person’s home might be his castle, but whether it will be a fortress surrounded by a moat or a gracious palace can depend a lot on that old real estate saw, location, location, location.
The cost of your retirement home, how much you’ll pay in property taxes, the cost of living in the area and many other factors determine whether that retirement Shangri-La will be a cozy cottage for two in a university town, a bungalow on the beach or a penthouse apartment overlooking sparkling city lights, with museums, restaurants and theaters within an easy stroll — maybe even in another country altogether.
But there are other intangibles to consider, too — such as whether you’ll be so forlorn at leaving family behind that you’ll either be miserable in situ or spend half your retirement budget traveling back to see the grandkids. And how good the health care facilities are in your new location — that can make a big difference not just in your budget, but maybe even in how long you survive to enjoy those golden years. Not to mention the crime rate and whether you’ll have a social support system in place.
Check out any prospective homes thoroughly before you make the big move, and make sure they have what you need to help you thrive during retirement.
4. Start saving more
While economizing might not be — or feel — glamorous, watching that 401(k) or IRA balance climb can certainly make you feel like a million bucks. Keep that in mind as you’re browsing for a new set of golf clubs or that perfect dress for a special evening out — especially if you don’t plan on playing golf in retirement or dining out on the town, because spending now could cost you big-time later on.
According to AARP data, 3 out of 5 — that’s more than half, folks — of the households headed by someone 65 years old or older have zero money in retirement accounts. That’s zero, as in zip, nada, nothing. How far into retirement will that get you? Into a job, most likely, working during the time that’s supposed to be your well-earned rest after a lifetime of supporting yourself and your family — if you can get one, that is.
Look for ways to cut your spending so that you can turn that money right around and put it to work for you in retirement. Whether it’s making coffee and lunches at home to bring to work or switching nights out with friends at a restaurant to entertaining at home, find ways to sock more away for the future — your future — when you’ll be glad you did.
3. Learn to live on a budget
You may already be doing this, but if you’re not, it’s probably time to start. While you may be planning to work in retirement, the job market may have other ideas — and if you’re dependent on a combination of Social Security and 401(k) or IRA money, that will limit your options. For one thing, seniors have to deal with a job market that’s prejudiced against them — and that’s stacked against them in other ways, too.
Not only that, but depending on who wins the election, your Social Security benefit may not be as predictable as you’d counted on — and then there’s the question of cost-of-living increases. After no increase at all for 2016, seniors will see a paltry average increase of $3.92, according to CNN. That’s a skinny 0.3 percent increase — hardly enough to notice.
And considering how health care costs are rising, women in particular need to be wary of stepping outside of a budget’s constraints; a Nationwide Retirement Institute study found that women could end up spending 70 percent of their Social Security benefits just paying for health care. Considering that women not only overwhelmingly (80 percent!) claim Social Security benefits early, thus locking in a lower benefit rate for their lifetimes, they depend on it to pay for 56 percent of their expenses in retirement.
That said, get used to living on less — you’re going to be doing so for a long, long time.
2. Prepare your home for the long run
If you’re planning on staying put in the house you’re currently living in, make sure it’s prepared for potential changes in your health and/or mobility — particularly if you don’t have coverage for nursing home care. While many people believe that Medicare will pay for a nursing home, should they become disabled, that’s not the case unless their assets are pretty much exhausted. Of course, that won’t take long when paying for the cost of care at a nursing facility.
In addition to stairs, reachable cabinets and accessible bathrooms, there’s the question of how affordable your home is. Can you refinance your mortgage at a cheaper rate? Rent out a room? Pay the property taxes? Maybe you should consider downsizing to a more affordable house, perhaps in the same neighborhood, if your network of friends and family is local. That can save you not just on taxes, but on heating and cooling bills.
It may not be what you had in mind, so it's smart to start setting realistic expectations of what your future retirement might look like.
1. Lower your expectations
Do you somehow expect that when you retire you’ll be traveling the world, dining at fine restaurants and going to the theater for every new production? Unless you have Warren Buffett’s budget, get real.
Most seniors have to cut back substantially when they leave the workforce. You will likely be no different. It’s easier to deal with that reality if you prepare for it mentally in advance, and realize that you’ll have to plan your excursions carefully and budget for them in advance.
The market was brutal to retirement plans during the Great Recession, and unless you were uncommonly fortunate, the money you saved for retirement throughout your career has not regained all lost ground. That said, depending on what you plan to do during your retirement years, you may still find it’s the most rewarding time of your life — particularly if those plans don’t depend on money.
See the original article Here.
Source:
Satter, M. Y. (2016 October 24). 5 ways to salvage retirement. [Web blog post]. Retrieved from address https://www.benefitspro.com/2016/10/24/5-ways-to-salvage-retirement?kw=5+ways+to+salvage+retirement&et=editorial&bu=BenefitsPRO&cn=20161025&src=EMC-Email_editorial&pt=Daily&page_all=1
Court denies NAFA in DOL fiduciary rule case
Department of Labor fiduciary rule survives its first challenge, by Nick Thornton
The National Association for Fixed Annuities has lost its challenge to the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule.
In a decision issued today in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Judge Randolph Moss denied NAFA’s motions for a preliminary injunction and summary judgment.
Among other things, NAFA claimed DOL violated the Administrative Procedure Act when it shifted the regulation of fixed indexed annuities to the rule’s Best Interest Contract Exemption. In the proposed version of the rule, FIAs were scheduled for regulation under the less restrictive Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24.
In shifting FIAs to the BIC exemption in the final rule, NAFA argued industry was not given adequate notice to comment on the implications, as the APA requires.
But Judge Moss cited case law showing that a final rule “need not be the one proposed” in the rulemaking process.
“It is enough that the final rule constitute a logical outgrowth” of the proposed version, wrote Moss.
Moss reasoned that NAFA was given adequate notice that the Department was considering regulating FIAs under the BIC exemption when it explicitly sought comments on whether annuities were adequately regulated in the proposal.
NAFA argued the proposal gave “no inkling whatsoever that the Department was considering moving FIAs from PTE 84-24 to the BIC.”
But Moss ruled that NAFA’s reading of the proposal, and DOL’s request for comment on the viability of how annuities were treated, was “not tenable.”
“The Department expressly requested comment on its decision to ‘continue to allow IRA transactions involving’ fixed indexed annuities ‘to occur under the conditions of PTE 84-24,” wrote Moss.
“That is, it (DOL) asked whether fixed indexed annuities should be grouped under PTE 84-24 or not,” added Moss. “And, if there were any doubt on this, it would be put to rest by the fact that NAFA, along with other industry groups, provided comments on that very issue.”
Full analysis of the ruling will follow.
See the original article Here.
Source:
Thornton, N. (2016 November 04). Court denies NAFA in DOL fiduciary rule case. [Web blog post]. Retrieved from address https://www.benefitspro.com/2016/11/04/court-denies-nafa-in-dol-fiduciary-rule-case?ref=hp-news&slreturn=1478547367
Robo-advisers play increasingly important role
Are you reaching all of your employee's for financial advising? Robo-advisers allow employee's to review materials in their own time but it's important to find the right balance. See the article below from Employee Benefit Adviser by Nick Otto on the potential perks of Robo-advisers.
Original article posted on EmployeeBenefitAdviser.co
Posted on September 29, 2016
Technology is increasingly evolving: from miniature scanners that monitor a cancer patient’s chemotherapy treatments right down to financial advice being offered to more than just the 1%.
The retirement landscape should no longer be a one-size-fits-all approach, said Andrew Wank, director of business development at Bloom. From the DIY to the HENRYs (high earners not rich yet), there is a middle group of employees that can be a challenge to reach in providing retirement advice, he added.
Robo-advisers lend themselves to helping employees in all aspects of life, Wank said Wednesday at EBA's Workplace Benefits Summit in Nashville, Tenn. “Plan sponsors recognize the limitations of what they’re already doing,” he said. “How can we provide a service or solution?”
Robo-advisers can be that solution, panelists agreed, because they reach all kinds of employees who don’t have easy access to financial advice. It combines technology with a human touch to most benefit employees, Wank said.
“Selecting a robo-adviser is going to be the same sort of process as picking your adviser,” added The Wagner Law Group’s Tom Clark, in agreement. “Make the decision in the best interest of your plan participants.”
And with the DOL’s effects coming into play in April, Betterment for Business’ General Manager, Cynthia Loh, added that while the final rule is widely talked about, it still isn’t very well understood.
“Explore all your options out there,” she advised. “Employees are more likely to engage with digital tools they can look at on their time. But given where we are today, it’s prudent with the DOL rule coming, on what’s out there. Make sure you understand what your fees are and what your employees are getting and what your employees’ needs are.”
See the Original Article Here.
Source:
Otto, N. (2016, September 29). Robo-advisers play increasingly important role [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.employeebenefitadviser.com/news/robo-advisers-play-increasingly-important-role
Automation making huge retirement plan impact
Paula Aven Gladych gives great insight on how automated retirement contributions are helping increase participation. See the full article from BenefitNews.com below.
Retirement plan participation has increased 19% in the past five years because of design features that make it simple and quick for employees to participate in their workplace retirement plans.
Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement and Trust examined the savings behaviors of 4 million defined contribution plan participants from 5,000 companies and found that features such as automatic defaults into diversified investments, target-date funds and automatic escalation have had a huge effect on employee savings rates.
The company’s Plan Health Index is a retirement plan health measure that includes a plan’s participation and savings rates and its diversification as a measure of employee retirement readiness.
Employees “have to join the plan, be saving at an adequate rate and be adequately diversified for their time horizon. If they are doing all three of those things well, they have a good chance for a good outcome, assuming they started saving early enough,” says Joe Ready, executive vice president and director of institutional retirement and trust at Wells Fargo.
To score well on the Wells Fargo Plan Health Index, employees need to participate in their workplace plan, save at 10% or higher, including the employer matching contribution, and have their retirement savings in diverse investments.
“Plan health across our book of business increased 37% from five years ago,” Ready says.
Participation increased 19%, contributions were up 7.3% from five years ago and diversification improved 26%, according to Wells Fargo research.
Generationally, millennials are reaping the biggest benefit from this industry shift toward automatic features. They have essentially grown up with these options, Ready says, and they have the highest increase in participation in the last five years. They also are the most diversified generation, taking advantage of target-date funds and other managed account options.
Millennials are also taking advantage of Roth 401(k) features at a higher rate than other generations. Wells Fargo found that 16% of millennials are taking advantage of a Roth option, compared to 12% of other participants.
“They are engaged,” Ready says. “They are thinking about their future taxes and tax diversification. That’s pretty good.”
The key drivers of plan participation are income, automatic features, tenure and age, Ready says. Wells Fargo analyzed tenure and found that once a company’s employees are hired and with the company for two years, their attrition rates tend to drop off dramatically.Ready encourages employers to design their retirement plans so that loyal employees, those who have stayed longer than two years, are eligible for the employer matching contribution. It’s a balance between helping employees achieve their retirement goals and wanting to invest in those who are invested in their company, he said.
Ready encourages employers to design their retirement plans so that loyal employees, those who have stayed longer than two years, are eligible for the employer matching contribution. It’s a balance between helping employees achieve their retirement goals and wanting to invest in those who are invested in their company, he said.
The way the matching contribution is designed can also have a major impact on how much employees save for retirement. If a company switches from contributing 50 cents on the first 3% to 25% on the first 6%, it automatically gets employees saving an additional 3% they wouldn’t save otherwise. Automatic increase is another feature that is underutilized, according to Ready.
Many companies set their automatic increase at 1% per year with an opt-out option. Ready says that whether the auto increase is 1% or 2%, the opt-out percentage is the same, so why not make the auto escalation 2% per year, bringing employees closer to that 10% savings rate sooner?
“It makes a material difference, especially at a younger age, to get to a higher savings rate quicker. It makes a big difference in outcome,” Ready says.
Two-thirds of Wells Fargo’s clients use an auto increase program, but “less than 30% of those plans implemented it on an opt-out basis,” the research found.
Having an opt-out option — meaning employees have to make the effort to opt out of the increase – takes advantage of participant inertia, Wells Fargo reported. Even with an opt-out option, 79% of plan participants stayed with the automatic increase on their retirement savings accounts.
Millennials tend to be more diversified in their retirement investments than older generations, due in large part to by the increase of automatic features in plans. Because of that, Wells Fargo found that 78% of millennials are on track to replace 80% of their pay in retirement, compared to 62% for Generation X and 50% for baby boomers.
“Some of that has to do with the fact that millennials are getting into the plan at an early age, saving early and diversifying appropriately with managed products,” Ready says.
That said, only 28.6% of millennials are contributing to their retirement account at the 10% level, compared to 35.2% for Generation X and 44.5% for the boomers.
“I’m very bullish on millennials, the way they are participating and the way they are engaging in the Roth
and leveraging diversification products in their plans,” Ready says. “If they keep increasing their savings rate, they have the power of time.”
Ready says he expects the trend toward automatic features in retirement plans to continue. He also sees a future rise in technology with a purpose. Wells Fargo has a mobile app that gives employees a one-click option to sign up for their company retirement plan. The company will send a text to all new employees with a link to the retirement plan sign-up page. It might say, “You are eligible to join our 401(k) plan.” When the participant clicks on the link, it takes her to a pre-filled screen that tells her what the default saving rate is and the default investments. If the employee is happy with the defaults, all she has to do is click the enroll button.
“We have seen a material increase in the number of people enrolling because of that,” Ready says.
See Original Post from BenefitNews.com Here.
Source:
Gladych, P.A. (2016, July 21). Automation making huge retirement plan impact [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.benefitnews.com/news/automation-making-huge-retirement-plan-impact
Employers Advised to Re-Evaluate Retirement Plan Costs
Original post benefitnews.com
Even with fee disclosure rules in place, it is hard for plan sponsors to discern the fairness of the fee structures in their retirement plans.
The TIAA Institute has taken issue with the fairness of per capita administrative service fees. In a recent report, the Institute says that plan sponsors need to look harder at the fee structures of their plans because what may seem fair might actually be penalizing the lowest paid or shortest term workers.
“When people started charging per head fees, people claimed it was fair. It doesn’t meet an economic standard of fairness. It is simple and transparent but definitely not fair,” says David Richardson, senior economist with the TIAA Institute and author of a recent research paper on assessing fee fairness.
It is up to plan sponsors to “do that classical weighing of efficiency vs. fairness and what it means. A per head fee is transparent but it is not a fair thing to do. … These per head fees are a clever way to charge expensive fees to younger, shorter tenure workers. I find it worrisome,” he says.
This has always been an issue but all of the fees were wrapped up in an all-inclusive fee that paid for investment, administrative and other services. Once the government began requiring an unbundling of fees, “we started seeing all of these things,” he says.
Historically, fees were charged on a percentage of assets basis, which was fair, he says.
He uses Social Security as an example of why a per-head fee is not equitable. Currently, Social Security charges administrative costs as a percentage of income taken in. If it decided to charge all 325 million people in the Social Security Administration system a flat $50 fee, “every man, woman and child, firm or disabled, would be charged the same because we are providing that service,” Richardson says. “I don’t think anybody would consider that to be fair but that is what flat fee advocates are claiming in a retirement plan.”
He doesn’t believe fee issues will go away anytime soon, saying that he believes the overwhelming majority of vendors in the market are honest but many of the regulations are geared to those who may not be.
“So, the government has to be proactive, not reactive on this. The tendency is to say if people have more information, they are better informed. That is not necessarily true,” he says. “A lot of people have a hard time understanding that information. It is tough. When they are saying we need more and more disclosure, more and more information is not just helpful. Sometimes it is just noise to people.”
So when deciding how to assess the effectiveness of a plan administrative fee structure, TIAA Institute says plan sponsors must follow four standards: adequacy, meaning that total fees collected must cover the cost of features and services provided to plan participants; transparency, meaning that everyone can easily find information about the fee structure and how the fees are used to cover the cost of plan features and services; administrative ease, meaning the fee structure is not too complicated or costly for either the plan sponsors or plan vendors; and fairness, which ensures that administrative fee structures must provide horizontal and vertical equity.
Horizontal equity means that “participants with similar levels of assets pay similar levels of fees”; and vertical equity means that “participants with higher levels of assets pay at least the same proportion in fees as those with lower asset balances,” according to TIAA Institute.
The Institute says that an administrative fee structure charging a flat pro rata fee can meet all four standards.
“This fee structure will be transparent, can easily satisfy adequacy, and is simple to administer. The pro rata fee will be fair because similar participants pay the same level of fees and higher asset participants pay the same proportion of fees as low asset participants,” TIAA Institute finds.
“Our goal is to help plan sponsors make the best decision for their plan and their plan participants,” Richardson says.
He also cautions ERISA plans to keep these four standards in mind because not doing so could violate the “spirit of non-discrimination rules,” he adds. “It tilts benefits in favor of key and highly paid employees.”
There’s the Wage Gap, and Then There’s the Sleep Gap
Original post lifehealthpro.com
More than half of men say worrying about money costs them sleep. Nearly 70 percent of women say the same.
That gap increased eight percentage points over the past year, according to a new survey by CreditCards.com. It makes sense, since women really do have more to worry about when it comes to money. Lower earnings means less in savings and Social Security benefits to fund longer lifespans.
"In general, people tend to lose sleep over things that feel out of their control," said Matt Schulz, senior industry analyst for CreditCards.com, part of the Bankrate Online Network. To him, the findings suggest you should "do whatever you can to take more control of your financial situation, whether it's just learning more, being more involved in your family's financial decisions, or starting a side gig."
The survey asked whether saving for retirement, paying for education, paying health-care or insurance bills, making the monthly rent or mortgage, and paying credit card debt were keeping people up at night. The poll, conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International, took a nationally representative sample of 1,000 adults.
The biggest fear cutting into a good night’s sleep is not having saved enough for retirement. The gender gap is narrower here than overall — 44 percent of women vs. 35 percent of men. All together, some 56 percent of men are losing sleep over money, compared with the 70 percent finding for women. In 2010, women received $12,000, on average, in Social Security benefits, a third less than a man’s average benefit of $17,856. At age 65 and older, women were 80 percent more likely than men to be impoverished, according to a study by the National Institute on Retirement Security.
Yet you can see worrying about retirement savings as a luxury, in a way, if it means you can meet your monthly bills. That's the most common sleep-stealing worry for people 30 or older with a college degree and an annual household income of $75,000 or more. Heath-care and insurance bills are the second-biggest sleep killer for women. For men, it's educational expenses. Those are a particular worry for millennials; 45 percent of people between ages 18 and 29 rank them as their worst anxiety. Among respondents between 30 and 49, a third said they lose sleep over educational costs. One of them is CreditCards.com's Schulz, who is 44 and has a son headed to college in about a decade. "In five years," he said, "you could see educational expenses being No. 1, or very close to No. 1, when we do this survey again."
Wellness Study Touts CFPs
Original post benefitspro.com
Only 22 percent of employees tracked in Financial Finesse’s 2015 year in review report being on track for retirement.
The provider of workplace financial wellness programs says that is a slight improvement from 2014. Of those that are not prepared, 81 percent have never used a financial calculator to estimate their retirement preparedness.
While the number of retirement-ready workers remains bleak, those participants who have repeated engagements with planning tools, and financial planners, are showing marked improvement in retirement readiness.
Enhancements in retirement workplace plan design, like auto-enrollment and auto-escalation, and technology that addresses asset allocation are vital tools for addressing workers’ retirement preparedness.
But the Financial Finesse’s data suggests those tools alone are not enough.
A good portion of the review is committed to comparing retirement readiness of those savers who engage in live interactions with financial planners.
About half of participants that had five or more interactions with a certified financial planner report being on track for retirement.
Levels of confidence drop in lock step with the number of interactions with financial planners: 32 percent of those with three to four interactions say they are on track to retire with adequate savings; 31 percent with one to two interactions believe as much; and only 21 participants who only interact with online planning tools say they are on track to retire with enough savings.
Interacting with CFPs also translates to higher confidence with investments and how they are allocated, as 64 percent of participants with five or more interactions say they are invested appropriately, compared to only 42 percent who use an online planning tool but don’t seek live financial advice.
Overall, retirement readiness is lacking across generations. Last year, only 30 percent of baby boomers say they are on track to reach their retirement goal, which was unchanged from the previous year.
Only 22 percent of Gen Xers and 16 percent of millennials said they are on track to retire well.
Debt is a major obstacle for boomers’ retirement readiness, the report says, as 42 percent of financially distressed boomers have no plan in place to pay off their debt, and increase from the previous year.
Participation rates in workplace retirement plans was high across all age groups, as even 73 percent of workers under age 30 report being enrolled in a plan; 91 percent of pre-retirees participate in their workplace plan.
Despite high rates of enrollment, financial planners and participants sited insufficient retirement savings as the top financial vulnerability for all age groups.
Average worker needs to save 15% to fund retirement
Originally posted July 22, 2014 by Nick Thornton on https://www.benefitspro.com
A typical household needs to save roughly 15 percent of their income annually to sustain their lifestyle into retirement, according to a brief from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
Generally, workplace retirement savings plans should provide one-third of retirement income, according to the study. For lower income families, defined contribution or defined benefit plans should provide a quarter of all retirement income. Higher income families will need their retirement plans to provide about half of all retirement income.
Middle-income families will require 71 percent of pre-retirement income to maintain living standards after they leave the workforce. About 41 percent of their retirement income is expected to come from social security.
Low-income families need an annual savings rate of 11 percent in order to sustain their lifestyle into retirement, which is lower than middle-income families (15 percent) and high-income families (16 percent). For lower income families, social security will replace a greater portion of pre-retirement income.
The Center’s National Retirement Risk Index says that half of Americans lack adequate savings to maintain their standard of living into retirement. A “feasible increase” in savings rates by younger workers can greatly affect their retirement wealth.
For those middle-income workers ages 30 to 39 who lack enough savings, a 7 percent increase in annual savings can provide adequate retirement funding. But middle-income workers age 50 to 59 who lack retirement savings would have to increase their annual savings rate by 29 percent, an unlikely expectation, the report adds.
For those older workers behind the curve, a better funding strategy would be “to work longer and cut current and future consumption in order to reduce the required saving rate to a more feasible level.”
Delaying retirement to age 70 greatly reduces the annual savings expectations workers need to meet in order to fund retirement.
A worker who starts saving at age 35 will need a 15 percent annual savings rate in order to retire at age 65. But if the same worker delays retirement until age 70, only a six percent annual savings rate is necessary.
A worker who starts saving at age 45 would need to save 27 percent annually to retire at 65. But by delaying retirement to age 70, the same worker only has to save 10 percent to maintain their standard of living after retirement.